Minor metadata correction
Fixes a name, affiliation, identifier, or citation field while recording the change when material.
Post-publication record
Published work sometimes requires correction, clarification, retraction, or a documented new version. The journal preserves the original citation trail and makes the status visible so readers can understand what changed and why.
journal corrections and retractions policy

A correction is appropriate when an error affects part of the record but the work remains reliable overall. A retraction may be necessary when findings are unreliable, publication is redundant or unethical, or serious integrity problems invalidate the article.
An expression of concern can alert readers while a substantial investigation is incomplete. A version notice can document a revised work when the publishing model supports distinct, traceable versions.
Key routes
Each route connects to the record or policy needed for the next decision.
Fixes a name, affiliation, identifier, or citation field while recording the change when material.
Explains a substantive but limited error and links both directions between the article and notice.
Keeps the record visible, marks its status clearly, and states the reason with appropriate care.
Practical detail
A notice identifies the affected article, names the type of action, describes the reason in clear terms, records the date, and links to the article. It distinguishes who is issuing or agreeing to the notice when that information matters.
The PDF and HTML record should remain clearly marked. Search metadata and DOI records should be updated so the status travels with the citation rather than living only on a separate announcement page.
Common questions
No. A replacement that changes the scholarly content should be documented through a correction or version process.
Not necessarily. Retraction signals that the article should not be relied upon as a valid part of the literature for the reasons stated in the notice.
Authors, readers, editors, institutions, or others may raise a specific concern. The journal assesses the record before acting.
Sources
These external resources provide additional policy or practice context. The journal’s own published policies govern its workflow.
Identify the article, exact issue, supporting evidence, and the correction you believe is needed.