Post-publication record

Corrections, Retractions, and Versioning

Published work sometimes requires correction, clarification, retraction, or a documented new version. The journal preserves the original citation trail and makes the status visible so readers can understand what changed and why.

Editorial illustration representing Post-publication changes and scholarly record preservation journal corrections and retractions policy
1Corrections2Retractions3Expressions of concern4Version history
Documented policy and transparent editorial decisions for Post-publication changes and scholarly record preservation
01

Match the Notice to the Problem

A correction is appropriate when an error affects part of the record but the work remains reliable overall. A retraction may be necessary when findings are unreliable, publication is redundant or unethical, or serious integrity problems invalidate the article.

An expression of concern can alert readers while a substantial investigation is incomplete. A version notice can document a revised work when the publishing model supports distinct, traceable versions.

Key routes

Use the Journal With Confidence

Each route connects to the record or policy needed for the next decision.

1

Minor metadata correction

Fixes a name, affiliation, identifier, or citation field while recording the change when material.

Open related resource

2

Article correction notice

Explains a substantive but limited error and links both directions between the article and notice.

Open related resource

3

Retraction or concern

Keeps the record visible, marks its status clearly, and states the reason with appropriate care.

Open related resource

Practical detail

What a Transparent Notice Contains

A notice identifies the affected article, names the type of action, describes the reason in clear terms, records the date, and links to the article. It distinguishes who is issuing or agreeing to the notice when that information matters.

The PDF and HTML record should remain clearly marked. Search metadata and DOI records should be updated so the status travels with the citation rather than living only on a separate announcement page.

  • Report the exact error and its location.
  • Assess whether conclusions remain reliable.
  • Link the notice and article in both directions.
  • Update metadata and downloadable files consistently.
  • Preserve the original citation and visible history.

Common questions

Questions Readers and Contributors Ask

Can an author quietly replace a published PDF?

No. A replacement that changes the scholarly content should be documented through a correction or version process.

Does a retraction mean every statement is false?

Not necessarily. Retraction signals that the article should not be relied upon as a valid part of the literature for the reasons stated in the notice.

Who can request a correction?

Authors, readers, editors, institutions, or others may raise a specific concern. The journal assesses the record before acting.

Sources

Standards and Further Reading

These external resources provide additional policy or practice context. The journal’s own published policies govern its workflow.

Report a Record Problem Precisely

Identify the article, exact issue, supporting evidence, and the correction you believe is needed.